There was a time, before the Depression of 2008, when
members of Congress vowed to review and revise “the biggest social engineering
project” of modern times – No Child Left Behind. Teachers across America can’t
help but wonder if their concerns will be lost in the deluge of serious
problems that face the new president and Congress. At the same time some
individuals continue to insist that NCLB has been a success and literacy scores have risen
dramatically, or at least significantly.
Some members of Congress, believing that claim, will not place NCLB
revision in the forefront of their concerns for the future of this country.
So, is NCLB working?
The January/February 2009 issue of NEA
today claim that NAEP (National
Assessment of Educational Progress) results answer that question. Although critics may claim that a teachers' union
publication would take that position, data does support their claim. This data is important as a measure because
NAEP is administered to large, random samples of students across the
country. Whereas individual states
create and score their own state tests, as required by NCLB, the NAEP test is
the same for all fourth grade students and is scored identically for the students
in Alaska and Maine. This makes it a more reliable
measure; the state literacy tests in Texas and Georgia look quite different
from the state tests in New York and Massachusetts.
What the data shows is that reading scores remain fairly
level; fourth grade students perform slightly better than prior to NCLB and
twelfth grade students perform slightly worse. Math scores also do not show a
drastic upward trend.
However, NAEP scores from the 1970s and 1980s showed
significant gains in literacy scores for minority students. Would that growth have continued if Bush and
NCLB hadn’t interfered with high-stakes testing that caused districts to throw
out literacy instruction to engage in endless test-prep and skill-and-kill
practice. The NCLB law, Reading First
and Title I, requires that districts receiving funds employ
“scientifically-based” methods and materials.
Has Congress ever realized that the decision behind NCLB and Title I
requirements are not based on data, or “scientifically-based” information? Reminds me of the decision to declare war on Iraq and ignore Afghanistan.
Comments